Pure unsheathes the FlashBlade, cuts out NetApp legacy system

A 24-rack #NetApp system has been replaced with a single #PureStorage #FlashBlade product at a customer site. Two Pure Storage staffers have tweeted that the replaced system spanned 1,008 rack units, was fitted with 13,000 disk drives. A Pure Storage source said that the replaced system was from NetApp. FlashBlade is Pure's flash-based system for fast access to unstructured data, and accompanies its FlashArray, which provides primary data storage. The intention is for FlashBlade storage to be used for Big Data analytics-type applications, and, we understand, the traditional scale-out filer apps that may have used Isilon and NetApp filers or similar products previously. The scale-out FlashBlade system sits in a 4U cabinet with 15 storage blades inside it. Each blade has up to 52TB of on-board capacity, meaning 780TB of max raw capacity, which after losing about one third for N+2 erasure coding, and amplifying with 3:1 data reduction, is 1.5PB. The customer's FlashBlade system costs millions of dollars less than and out-performs the NetApp array, we're told. Partly this is because flash is faster than disk but also because the FlashBlade IO load is automatically processed across all blades. In contrast, in a FAS cluster the IO of a volume can only be processed by a single controller.

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/02/pure_flashblade_takes_out_netapp/

FlashBlade is closer than you think

Analysis In Alexandre Dumas' novel The Three Musketeers, a Gascon outsider, D'Artagnan, and three musketeers – Aramis, Athos and Porthos – take on De Richelieu, the French Cardinal, along with his allies and troops. In our flash systems world there is a parallel: swashbuckling #PureStorage, led by Scott Dietzen, with three product musketeers: FlashSystem, #FlashBlade, and the yet-to-be-revealed third product, are taking on storage king #EMC and its forces. FlashArray we know about while FlashBlade is still developing. Stifel MD and financial analyst Aaron Rakers talked to Pure Storage architect and co-founder CHECK John Hayes to find out more about the FlashBlade scale-out, all-flash, filer product. He learned that the beta test phase was ending with directed (limited) availability starting in the August-October period, Pure's fiscal 2017 third quarter. General availability starts in the November '16 to January '17 period, Pure's Q4 fy17. Pure is actively taking orders and progressing to a Proof of Concept (POC) phase. The current version lacks CIFS support and snaphots. It uses 2D MLC flash and Pure believes that using this on its own flash chip-carrying blades plus an NVMe architecture means it has a lower cost base than it would by using SSDs. It is expected that this will transition to #3DNAND. Rakers notes Quad-Level Cell (QLC) 3D NAND could become interesting for FlashBlade given its architectural positioning for massive pools of low-cost Flash where workloads require limited writes – potentially a 2018 story. Pure says FlashBlade will have a $3/GB raw cost and sub-$1/GB effective cost after data reduction. The main competition focus is EMC's scale-out Isilon filer, which was designed in and for the disk era. Pure asserts FlashBlade offers linear performance scaling. Other competitive focuses are Qumulo (a scale-out filer startup), Ceph and Seagate's ClusterStor. El Reg thinks FlashBlade will also butt up against DDN Storage's ExaScaler and GridScaler products and IBM's Spectrum Scale, the old GPFS. EMC has its Project Nitro, a previewed blade-based all-Flash product using Isilon's OneFS software. EMC World 2016 conference reports suggested Nitro beta testing would start later this year with GA in 2017. That timescale, if adhered to, makes #Nitro a clear FlashBlade competitor.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/14/flashblade_is_closer_than_you_think/