SAN JOSE, Calif., Jan. 30, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- @Violin ® Systems LLC, the enterprise storage industry leader for #extremeperformance with consistent #lowlatency and #dataservices, was selected as one of four companies highlighted as providing "Innovative Solutions to Data Storage Challenges" in a recently published Frost & Sullivan Stratecast Analysis by Vice President of Cloud Services, @Lynda Stadtmueller. Stratecast collaborates with Frost & Sullivan clients to reach smart business decisions in the rapidly evolving and hypercompetitive Information and Communications Technology markets. Stratecast Perspectives & Insight for Executives (SPIE) Volume 18, Number 1 looked at storage providers that stand out for their innovative solutions and growth potential. Violin was selected as a company worth watching because of its ability to retain and regain the confidence of more than 100 large business customers, including many Fortune 500 companies. "The company originally made its mark with market-leading hardware-based all-flash array storage systems – only to lose ground as the market shifted to software-based controls and features," the report states. "Today, the new Violin Systems is turning its culture of innovation toward software development, particularly with the Concerto OS 7 data services platform that support advanced functionality for data scaling, cloud data tiering, data protection, data reduction, and business continuity. The Violin Symphony management system provides granular visibility and insight into the Violin Flash Storage Platform and Violin All Flash Arrays." "We are honored to be named among the select few storage companies to watch in Frost & Sullivan's latest Stratecast," said Ebrahim Abbasi, Violin Systems' CEO and president. "Ms. Stadtmueller definitely captured the spirit of our company's re-emergence when she said that we are returning to our roots as market leader in all-flash arrays by focusing on innovative technology. With an emphasis on software-based solutions, an aggressive product roadmap and commitment to continued innovation, I'm confident that we will not only be a company to watch for 2018 but for many years to come." Violin has made an excerpt from the Frost & Sullivan SPIE available for download to interested parties from its website at https://www.violin-systems.com/wp-content/uploads/SPIE-2018_Frost-and-Sullivan.pdf. Other companies in this report Other companies selected were Elastifile, SwiftStack, and StorONE. About Violin Violin, the disruptive innovator in All Flash Arrays, is revolutionizing how businesses operate by enabling storage technology to be Instrumental to their company by changing the SLAs and capabilities of private, hybrid and public cloud environments. The Flash Storage Platform™, powered by Concerto OS™, a fully integrated storage operating system, is the industry leader in the combination of every significant category measured in all flash arrays: low latency, affordability, density, scalability and performance. With tightly integrated data services, the Violin Flash Storage Platform provides a unique combination of data protection, business continuity, and data reduction services onto a flexible, uniquely scalable solution called Scale Smart™, delivering significant CAPEX and OPEX savings. Founded in 2005, Violin is headquartered in San Jose, California
TechNewSources is a one stop shop for all the latest, datacenter TechnNews you can use.
Dell, EMC, Dell Technologies, Cisco,
Wednesday, January 31, 2018
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Violin Provides Customers with Breadth of Acquisition and Deployment Options
SAN JOSE, Calif., Jan. 16, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- @Violin® Systems LLC, the enterprise storage industry leader for extreme performance with consistent low latency and data services, announced today a multi-pronged sales strategy that offers the flexibility that enterprises need to achieve the greatest data center efficiencies. With the Violin #FlashStorage Platform™, enterprises can transition from legacy storage solutions to enterprise-class all-flash storage to achieve favorable CAPEX and OPEX scenarios. Enterprises looking to simplify their storage, data center and business economics can further take advantage of moving to the Violin Flash Storage Platform through their preferred method of acquisition and deployment. Customers can now leverage flash to drive faster application performance in a smaller footprint and with reduced power consumption for a cost lower than the traditional HDD arrays or hybrid arrays either by purchasing the Violin Flash Storage Platform directly through the company; through a set monthly acquisition fee from Violin's leasing partner; or via a cost-flexible, subscription model for as low as a 1 cent per gigabyte per month. The new Violin subscription program provides enterprise users with on-premise protection and unbeatable speed at cloud economics. This low price includes Violin's Gold Support
Monday, January 8, 2018
Excitable backupper Exagrid eyes IPO
@Exagrid says it's steering a methodical path to an eventual IPO unlike reckless cash-burning storage startups that fail or need to be acquired (rescued). It says its final 2017 quarter was a blast with record bookings and revenue, rounding out a record bookings and revenue year. It gained more than 100 new customers in the quarter, a record number with a first purchase order in the six-figure range, and it opened offices in the Czech Republic, Israel and Australia. The competitive landscape has @Dell EMC #DataDomain as the giant in the space. But @Exagrid CEO and president @Bill Andrews claimed: "We are replacing more and more Data Domain installations. We are seeing @HP #StoreOnce less and less..." And @Rubrik? "We see Rubrik when the customer is looking to replace their backup application. We see Rubrik moving away from selling hardware so we hope that one day we can actually work with them." The @Nutanix #AHV base looks like an opportunity. "We see a great opportunity ahead of us working with the @Comtrade Software's HYCU product to penetrate Nutanix environments running the Nutanix AHV hypervisor versus @VMWare." Exagrid is scaling up its in-house sales effort. "We are in the process of doubling our inside sales team that prospects to find new opportunities. We have one calling centre in the US (Westborough, Massachusetts) and just opened up a second (Bedford). We are also opening up a call centre in Dublin, Ireland." A year ago Exagrid also announced a record fourth quarter, and talked about the possibility of an IPO. Andrews now says: "We are methodically building a sustainable company that can go public. We have met with over a dozen investment banking firms and know exactly what we have to do. "We are very different from all the other backup and storage companies that run hard, burn a ton of cash to grow their top line and then hit a wall and have to sell the company or close their doors such as Tintri, Tegile, Violin, Simplivity, Nimble, and many others." ®
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/08/exagrid_ipo_hopes/
Monday, November 13, 2017
Violin rises from ashes with new products planned for 2018
Bankrupted #allflash pioneer’s CEO says company has learned the lessons of its demise and is planning file, object, #softwaredefinedstorage and a careful entry into the #NVMe market #Flashstorage pioneer @Violin Memory has emerged from bankruptcy and is aiming for new file, cloud and object access additions to its products in 2018 plus software-defined storage, with NVMe systems planned for 2019.
“The company went public [in 2013], money was spent and there wasn’t much focus on the future,” he said.
“The company was run by smart people and they thought they could conquer the world. But successful companies should be prepared to be copied and they missed out on getting to the maturation phase.”
Key products for Violin are still the 7650 and 7450 all-flash arrays launched last September and the high-availability stretch cluster that can link Violin instances at up to 100km.
Building on this, in the second quarter out of bankruptcy, Abbasi said Violin has “regained the confidence of customers”, provided cashflow with “a positive line of sight to profit” and is providing 24/7 support. It is also looking at software acquisitions, he said.
The company is now planning its next product phases, said Abbasi. By mid-2018, Violin plans to introduce file and block access storage on the same platform. Currently, its products are block access only.
By the end of next year, it aims to provide access to the public cloud as a tier of storage, storage quality of service policies, products delivered as software-defined storage and object storage capabilities.
Wednesday, November 1, 2017
Violin Expands Leadership with Appointment of Susan Scheer Aoki as EVP Product Operations
SAN JOSE, Calif., Oct. 31, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- @Violin ® Systems LLC, the enterprise storage industry leader for extreme performance with consistent low latency and data services, announced today that it has appointed Susan Scheer Aoki as its new executive vice president, product operations.  Scheer Aoki has already led Violin's professional services and global support teams that provide customers a seemless path to all flash architectures for their mission critical environments, having served the company as its senior vice president of customer operations. With this promotion, she will also oversee R&D with professional services and global support to deliver compelling products, services, and support experiences for customers to achieve their business and technical objectives. "Susan is a passionate leader and a tireless customer advocate, able to translate customer insights into product leadership," said Ebrahim Abbasi, Violin CEO. "Our investment in R&D requires investment in talent like Susan's in order to deliver the next generation of availability, capacity and performance to the industry." "This is an important time for Violin Systems, with new innovation, new services for Fortune 100 customers, and new avenues to profitability," said Scheer Aoki. "I look forward to building on Violin's rich innovation and product leadership in high performance with consistent low latency, and our commitment to customers to power what's next." Scheer Aoki has two decades of experience in executive management with positions across the product development lifecycle and customer success. Key positions include VP, Solutions and ITaaS and VP, Personalized Enterprise Services at NetApp. She also held VP, Engineering, VP, Product Management, and VP, Marketing roles focused on networking and cloud management products and solutions at Cisco Systems. Scheer Aoki has received multiple awards for her industry leadership and product achievements, including Most Powerful Women in Technology, Most Powerful and Influential Women of California, Best of Brand, and Product of the Year. About Violin: Violin, the disruptive innovator in All Flash Arrays, is revolutionizing how businesses operate by enabling storage technology to be Instrumental to their company by changing the SLAs and capabilities of private, hybrid and public cloud environments. The Flash Storage Platform™, powered by Concerto OS™, a fully integrated storage operating system, is the industry leader in the combination of every significant category measured in all flash arrays: low latency, affordability, density, scalability and performance. With tightly integrated data services, the Violin Flash Storage Platform provides a unique combination of data protection, business continuity, and data reduction services onto a flexible, uniquely scalable solution called Scale Smart™, delivering significant CAPEX and OPEX savings. Founded in 2005, Violin is headquartered in San Jose, California.
Thursday, June 15, 2017
Violin Memory (VMEM) and NetApp (NTAP) Head to Head Comparison
#NetApp (NASDAQ: NTAP) and #Violin Memory (NYSE:VMEM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitabiliy, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk
92.4% of NetApp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.7% of Violin Memory shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of NetApp shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Violin Memory shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Tuesday, June 13, 2017
Global Enterprise Flash Storage Market 2017 – Pure Storage Inc., Virident Systems, Inc., Violin Memory Inc., Oracle Corporation, NetApp Inc.
The worldwide Enterprise #FlashStorage Market report launched by Market.biz focuses on a complete and accurate study of Enterprise Flash Storage industry. Global Enterprise Flash Storage Market 2017 report is fundamentally concentrated on current scenario of Enterprise Flash Storage market. This comprehensive research document will improve the efficiency of the Enterprise Flash Storage market during the forecast period from 2017 to 2022. The Enterprise Flash Storage industry report covers different aspects of market such as Enterprise Flash Storage Market Segment, Enterprise Flash Storage categories of the product, market revenue and product cost. The report also shows the Enterprise Flash Storage market volume for every category during the forecast period. Do Inquiry Before Purchasing the Report Here: https://market.biz/report/global-enterprise-flash-storage-market-2017/99239/#inquiry Competitive Research of Global Enterprise #FlashStorage Market 2017 Based on Key Vendors: 1 #Pure Storage Inc. 2 #Virident Systems, Inc. 3 #Violin Memory Inc. 4 #Oracle Corporation 5 #NetApp Inc. 6 #EMC Corporation 7 #Kaminario Inc. 8 #Nimble Storage Inc. 9 #Nimbus Data Systems Inc. 10 #Skyera Inc. 11 #Tegile Systems, Inc. 12 #WesternDigital Corporation 13 #WhipTail Technologies, Inc. 14 #LSI Corporation 15 #FusionIO, Inc.
http://registrardaily.com/2017/06/13/global-enterprise-flash-storage-market-2017/
Monday, May 22, 2017
Rubrik CEO: It's a passion project, not a hobby and not a 'job
How did Bipul Sinha, a man with neither entrepreneurial nor operation executive-level tech business experience, become the CEO of startup #Rubrik? In his teens Sinha learnt English in India, studied, gained an electrical engineering degree then emigrated to the USA as a software engineer. Later he left #Oracle and gained an MBA, which led to venture capital investing. In 2014, when he was in his late 30s, he stepped sideways from being an investment partner at venture capital company Lightspeed to co-found Rubrik. As three-year-old VC-backed startups go, Rubrik is doing a damn fine job so far, with a billion dollar-plus valuation and a $100 million run rate. It's not made any obvious missteps that have sucked down other storage-related startups, such as #Exanet, #Violin Memory, sTEC, and many more. You would think you need CEO-level experience to avoid making the mistakes that doomed these companies, yet Sinha has none of that. Is there something about being a VC which means that, when you do become a CEO of a VC-backed startup, you have a much firmer grasp on what the company needs to do and not do? Such as achieve a great exit; either by IPO or acquisition, or, as in Rubrik's case, to become an enduring institution that outlasts its founders.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/22/rubrik_ceo_profile/
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Violin Memory steps out of bankruptcy, takes the storage stage again
#Violin Memory is back, as a privately owned company fresh out of bankruptcy. The old flash array hardware and software company, which went bankrupt after a long and tortuous struggle, has been bought by #QuantumPartners, a private investment fund run by #Soros Fund Management LLC (SFM Private Equity). We're told Violin retains its industry-leading, proprietary technology, strong customer base and innovative team of professionals – but not all of them. Most of the old senior management team has been swept aside and the new management bods are: CEO and president - Ebrahim Abbasi, who was the SVP for Operations CFO - Jim Curley SVP customer success operations - Susan Scheer Aoki, who joined Violin in April 2015 Chief architect - Tim Stoakes VP software development - Pat Balakrishnan VP worldwide field operations - Georgine Nordin, who leads the sales and alliances strategy A prepared quote from Abbasi said: "I am honored to lead the new company into the future and focus on product innovation and customer excellence." These points were repeated in a similar quote from Nicholas Esayan, principal with SFM Private Equity: "We are committed to support Violin in its tradition of customer excellence and product innovation."
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/25/violin_memory_back_and_private/
Thursday, January 5, 2017
2016 – the year 3D XPoint came down to earth from Planet Hype
Storage Review in 2016 Storage in 2016 saw its on-premises #SAN /filer array heartland assaulted by the public cloud on the one hand, and #hyperconverged and #softwaredefinedstorage on the other. The now-classic dual-controller disk array went hybrid to keep storing primary data, but all-flash arrays are taking on that role and so the hybrids went all flash too. High-end monolithic arrays saw newcomer Infinidat make roaring progress as it took share with its low-priced and highly available #InfiniBox array. Secondary data was sucked off more and more to object storage, which itself saw a mass adoption of S3 as the preferred interface, leaving mainstream disk and hybrid arrays storing relatively less and less on-premises data. The public cloud growth was unstoppable, with AWS out ahead, followed by #Azure and #Google, and then by #Oracle and #IBM – the only on-premises storage suppliers with public cloud service ambitions. The 451 Research group forecast public cloud storage spend to double in two years – with #NetApp, #HPE and IBM moving down the supplier rankings as Amazon's AWS and #Microsoft 's Azure clawed their way up. Hyper-converged infrastructure was a storage hot point, with #Nutanix having a successful IPO and powering ahead to lead the market. #Cisco, #DellEMC, #Lenovo, and HPE made hyper-converged products move as suitability for sales of servers inside a combined server, storage and networking sell exploded. Product Births There were notable product introductions: Dell EMC's #DSSD unit announced its #NVME-accessed and NVME drive-using D5 array. Dell EMC re-engineered its #VNX and #VNXe arrays to produce the Unity line. Dell EMC introduced an all-flash Isilon scale-out filer. #Cisco introduced its #HYPERFLEX hyper-converged system, and it introduced a storage server version of its #UCS line. Primary Data started shipping its DataSphere storage silo-converging product. SpectraLogic announced the biggest, baddest, largest tape library in the world – the TFinity ExaScale edition, with 1EB of capacity and support for LTO, IBM and Oracle formats. Amazon went into physical storage with its Snowball 80TB hard disk drive enclosure transfer to its public cloud from customer data centres, and its 100PB Snowmobile trucked shipping container of storage. One notable non-event was Dell EMC's converged systems business deciding not to change vBlock servers from Cisco UCS products to Dell PowerEdge ones. The most intriguing startup was Brian Ignomirello's Symbolic IO, which claims its technology runs database queries 60 times or more faster than other systems – even XPoint-using ones – through a different way of coding stored data and processing it. Micron flash storage exec Rob Peglar joined Symbolic IO as its CTO during 2016, giving it additional credibility. Acquisitions Dell and EMC was the big event, a $67bn acquisition by privately owned Dell that saw storage industry legend Joe Tucci retire, and David Goulden's EMC Information Infrastructure business unit become the Dell EMC server, storage and networking organization. Michael Dell is now an entrepreneurial IT colossus alongside Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and Larry Ellison. Load Dynamix and Virtual Instruments merged after VI ran into revenue growth problems. Load Dynamix investors provided $20m additional funding for the resulting Virtual Instruments company. The new company believes its ability to capture production workload profiles (via Virtual Instruments technology) and replay them in a test lab (Load Dynamix technology) will speed problem identification and resolution. Virtual Instruments then bought hybrid cloud and virtualisation performance management technology business Xangati in November. IBM bought object storage supplier CleverSafe and promptly put its software in the IBM public cloud, gaining first place in the object storage market. All-conquering Nutanix bought VMware memory cacher PernixData at a price that we were told caused Pernix VC funders to take a hit in their investments. Disk drive manufacturing boss WDC bought SanDisk and its assorted flash technologies and products. Hyper-converged infrastructure appliance (HCIA) vendor GridStore bought DCHQ, renamed itself HyperGrid, and now delivers hyper-converged infrastructure-as-a-service (HCIaaS). The DCHQ tech, among other things, containerises existing traditional applications. HCIA vendor Pivot 3 bought Nexgen, a flash array business with QoS technology, after it was spun out of SanDisk. Cavium bought HBA and vendor QLogic in June and started making noises about NVMe over Fibre Channel. Storage and Ethernet networking supplier Brocade bought Ruckus Wireless for $1.5bn in April as it looked for a new growth avenue. This walk up wireless avenue was itself overtaken when Broadcom bought Brocade for $5.9bn in November. This signalled the end of the three standalone storage networking suppliers: Brocade, Emulex and QLogic. All three were acquired by larger, more broadly based businesses. The Fibre Channel SAN market was not big enough to support them. Deaths All-flash array pioneer Violin Memory threw in the towel after a long and tortuous struggle with continuous loss-making quarters, a reverse stock split, NYSE ejection threats and then an ejection. It applied for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in December. The misguided VC of the year award goes to Art Samberg, chairman and president of Pequod Capital, who bought 5.3 million Violin shares in June, before the NYSE expulsion, when they were trading at $0.62, implying a cost of $3.3m. They are now, in Violin’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy state, listed as worth $0.0462, implying a value of $245,000, a loss of around $3m. You win some, you lose some, eh Art? Flash and storage supplier X‑IO – think ISE products – closed its Colorado Springs manufacturing operation and laid off employees in May. There is some hope that its technology, specifically its NVMe Axellio tech, might find a home somewhere. X‑IO had never become the success that financial backers Seagate and VC Oak Capital had wished for. Crossroads sold its loss-making archiving products to StrongBox Data Solutions of Canada and is now focussing on patent licensing. Quantum shut its Symform sync and share business down in June. A non-death event was XtremIO, where rumors of its coming downgrade relative to all-flash VMAX inside EMC were strenuously denied, and the addition of file storage capabilities to XtremIO revealed later in the year. At the CEO level: Hyper-V-focussed hyper-converged system vendor Gridstore ejected CEO George Symons in April. Chairman Nariman Teymourian eventually replaced him. Cloud storage gateway supplier Panzura changed its CEO from Randy Chou to Patrick Harr. Chou is now CEO and co-founder of cloud-based, security-as-a-service startup Nubeva. Mangstor CEO Trevor Smith was replaced by Craig Gilmore, who impressed the hell out of Mangstor's founder and board, despite having no storage technology experience. But then neither did ex‑CEO Trevor Smith, we were told. Qumulo CEO and co-founder Peter Godman transitioned to a CTO role as Bill Richter was recruited to be the new CEO and President. Triumphant Veeam co-founder and CEO Ratmir Timoshev stepped down, with William Largent taking over. Ejections and divorce EMC sold its content management business – think Documentum, etc – before its acquisition by Dell was consummated. Hopefully the new owner can turn this under-performing mongrel into a fresh puppy. Symantec separated from Veritas by selling Veritas to the Carlyle Group, so confirming what virtually everybody knew: that it had failed to integrate the Vertitas storage products after buying it originally, with its security business, and there was no synergy between storage and Symantec's notion of security. Imation's storage businesses were sold off by the owning Clinton Group, leaving an investing business behind. The Memorex trademark went in January with Nexsan's sale to private equity organised in December. With proactive ownership and a re-energised exec roster, Nexsan could grow in 2017. Alliances HPE invested $10m in object storage vendor Scality in January. Cisco invested in hyper-converged system software startup Springpath then introduced its Springpath-powered Hyperflex hyper-converged appliance and started a big push into the HCIA market. Lenovo set up an alliance with Juniper to build converged, hyper-converged and hyper-scale data centre infrastructure products. It also partnered with numerous HCIA vendors: think #Nutanix, #Pivot3, #SimpliVity, #Atlantis and #Maxta. It allied with Nexenta so its servers could run NexentaStor software, and partnered with Nimble Storage and its arrays. Pure Storage and #Cohesity agreed on a deal for Cohesity to provide converged secondary storage facilities behind #Pure 's primary storage flash arrays. #SanDisk allied with #RedHat so that red-hatted Ceph could run #SanDisk 's #InfiniFlash flash-filled enclosures. So far InfiniFlash, with selling deals with #Nexenta and #Tegile, has not set the world on fire. VC funding Where did the storage VC money go in 2016? #Objectstorage and S3‑compliance evangelist Cloudian raised $41.3m in a D‑round. Security and file-sharing cloud storage gateway supplier CTERA raised a $25m E‑round. Datera raised $40m. #Datrium and its server-powered storage ran a $55m C‑round. NVDIMMer #Diablo Technologies raised $37m in a C‑round – and got itself a new CEO. DriveScale raised a $15m A‑round. End-point protector and file sharer Druva raised $51m in an E‑round. NVME-accessed array startup E8 had a $12m B‑round. All-flash array SW developer Elastifile drew in $35m in a B‑round along with a Cisco investment. Gridgain had a $15m B‑round. Hyper-converged appliance supplier Gridstore had a $19m C‑round. NVMe-accessed array startup Mangstor raised $5m in a C‑round; relative peanuts for a hardware/software startup's third round. Carbon nanotube memory startup Nantero ran a $21m F‑round; productisation taking a long time. Cloud storage gateway and data services supplier Nasuni raised $17.5m in an E‑round plus $7.5m venture debt financing. Flash endurance tech startup NVMdurance went through a $2.23m A‑round. NVMe-accessed array startup Pavilion Data Systems had a $15m A‑round. HCIA and flash array supplier Pivot3 raised $54.6m in a G‑round with bank funding. Scale-out filer startup Qumulo raised $32.5m in a C‑round. Secondary data silo-converging and data protecting #Rubrik raised $61m in a C‑round. Hadoop and RDMS combiner Splice Machine raised $9m in its C‑round. Velostrata had a $17.5m B‑round. Software replicator Zerto raised $70 million in its E‑round. That list represents a total of half a billion, $581.67m to be exact, in funding we know about that was pumped into startups and pre-IPO storage companies in 2016. That's not a great year with around $1.8bn being invested in 2013, over $3bn in 2014, and some $1.8bn in 2015. This is a significant reduction. We figured a golden age of storage startups was coming to end in an article in September. IPOs Nutanix ran its IPO in September and it has been judged a success. Its shares opened at $26.00 and are now trading at $26.86. In this IPO game that's a success, by the way. Pure Storage IPO'd in October 2016 with an opening price of $17.00 and shares now trade at $11.15; way to go Nutanix. Magneto-resistive RAM startup Everspin filed an IPO in September. Think of MRAM as a kind of specialized XPoint-class non-volatile memory that doesn't have the potential application or marketing drive that XPoint possesses. Everspin IPO'd in October with shares starting at $9.10. They are now worth $7.84, having risen from a low of $6.33 in late October. Tech developments All-flash arrays became mainstream, with every incumbent vendor either bringing out new-design flash arrays (EMC DSSD, HDS A‑Series) or retrofitting SSDs or flash modules to existing arrays. Nimble Storage completed its pivot to all-flash arrays with a successfully introduced product. NetApp's all-flash FAS proved popular. Pure Storage is the only all-flash array startup to make it to IPO so far and has remained a top-four all-flash array supplier. Indeed, it opened up its second major product line in March with FlashBlade, a rack-scale system using proprietary storage blades, for storing unstructured data. Pure's triumphal 2016 was marred only slightly by having to pay its way out of a Dell EMC lawsuit over IP. Interestingly, Toshiba announced its FlashMatrix competitor to FlashBlade in August. This is an Atom CPU-powered realtime, scale-out, compute-plus-flash analytics engine. Toshiba has yet to announce how it will come to market, meaning channel, and there was no pricing or availability information at its launch. NVMe-over-fabrics, with its server storage stack-bypassing RDMA technique, could be the last major technology development for on-premises array connectivity. Many startups focussed on the area; Apeiron, E8, Excelero, Mangstor and Pavilion Data Systems for example. Virtually all the incumbents said they would support the technology, including old-timers HPE and NetApp, and newcomers Kaminario, Tegile and Pure Storage. Dell EMC's DSSD unit introduced its D5 NVMe over fabrics-accessed array. The fibre channel HBA suppliers said they would support NVMe over Fibre Channel, providing an installed base upgrade path. Server operating systems and applications need to transition to NVMeoF – a clumsy acronym – and the impetus behind that should strengthen in 2017. SSD density-increasing 3D NAND became mainstream as well, with WD (SanDisk) and Toshiba on the one hand, and Intel and Micron on the other following Samsung's lead and shipping product. Intel announced its 3D NAND SSDs in March. SK Hynix also has shipping 48-layer 3D NAND product and is developing 72-layer technology. Toshiba and others started talking more about QLC (4bits/cell) flash technology as a possibly affordable solid state archive medium, where its low write endurance would not matter. Toshiba briefed attendees at the Flash Memory summit on a 100TB QLC SSD idea. Even China has its own plans to enter the 3D NAND manufacturing area, having been rebuffed when trying to buy Micron and invest in Western Digital. DataCore dominated the SPC-1 benchmark with its Parallel IO software and just blew the price-performance numbers away; sub-$50k DataCote x86 servers trouncing $1mn-plus mega storage arrays, and showing storage array IO waits had large CPU wait components as IO stack processing hit CPU bottlenecks. Oracle SVP Chuck Hollis said the SPC-1 benchmark and DataCore's tech was irrelevant to real IT life. DataCore's chairman said that was just sour grapes. Latecomer Seagate finally entered the helium-filled drive era in January with a seven-platter 10TB disk. It said it would ship 12TB helium drives for testing later in the year, with 14TB ones in its roadmap. Toshiba, the third disk drive supplier, did not introduce helium-filled drive technology, confirming it will be a capacity laggard. However, such drives might arrive in 2018, assuming Toshiba can get over the multibillion-dollar hit of its Westinghouse nuclear power plant projects in the USA, without re-planning disk drive investment schedules, or indeed selling its disk drive business. Seagate says brand new heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) drives will appear in 2017, with HAMR replacing perpendicular magnetic recording. Think 16TB initially? Infinidat sees 20TB disk drives on the horizon. Just to show what it can do, Seagate filled a 3.5-inch drive enclosure with flash to produce a 60TB demo SSD. It's a startling idea but the cost would be prohibitive, any other SSD maker could easily do the same thing, and it basically seems like face-saving technology because Seagate is a bit-player in flash and needs to do much, much more. A partnership with SK Hynix has been rumoured but nothing has been said publicly by either company. Our sense is that if Seagate chairman and CEO Steve Luczo doesn't get Seagate a proper flash strategy and chip supply partnership then toastdom threatens. To add ignominy, Seagate's Kinetic disk drives, Ethernet-accessed drives with an object storage capability, sputtered without catching fire, while Igneous and OpenIO rejected Seagate's tech and introduced their own products, each plugging an ARM-based micro-server onto 3.5-inch disk drives. We'll see how they do this year. Object storage made steady progress throughout the year, with HPE investing in Scality, Dell renewing a Scality OEM deal, and WD HGST unit introducing a new 14PB archive array. With Dell buying EMC then that organisation has in-house object storage technologies to measure against Scality's RING and 2017 might see a shakeout there. As with its Nutanix OEM deal though, the level of customer demand could prove to be the deal's saviour – or the opposite. IBM leapt to the top of IDC's object marketscape charts following its late 2015 acquisition of CleverSafe. The software is being used in IBM's public cloud and this, together with its FlashSystem are highlights of what has been the now-traditional decline in IBM's storage hardware revenues throughout 2016. However, IBM did put a new executive in charge of storage and he, Ed Walsh, might make visible changes in 2017. Hyper-converged infrastructure was the dominant storage story in 2016. Nutanix's IPO was part of that. Dell EMC with VSAN, ScaleIO and VxRail/VxRack was the number-two vendor, and straining every one of Chad Sakac's sinews to overtake Nutanix. But it didn't get there and, indeed, Dell decided that the combined Dell EMC should carry on selling the OEM'd Nutanix XC system; customer demand was that important. HPE launched its gen 2 hyper-converged product in March. It launched the even newer (gen 3?) HC 250 and HC 380 systems in December. SimpliVity added Hyper-V support in April. Even NetApp started talking about a hyper-converged system it was developing. HPE is preparing for servers with enhanced and persistent memory capabilities, with Machine-developed technologies on the one hand and non-volatile flash and XPoint or ReRAM components on the other. It introduced a ProLiant server using power fail-protected Micron flash DIMMs in March, and the Machine project was splashed all over a customer event in November. HPE's Memristor technology seems as far away as it ever was, particularly with HPE Labs boss and Memristor evangelist Martin Fink retiring, and HPE signing a partnership with SanDisk over ReRAM. Our sense is that flash DIMMs are still an early stage technology with no great server IEM wins by, for example, Diablo Technology. Our sense is that non-volatile DIMMs are going to be an XPoint-driven technology and not a flash-driven one. Faster 32Gbps Fibre Channel, doubling 16Gbps FC speed, was introduced smoothly during the year but its impact was muted by the gathering enthusiasm for far faster array access using RDMA techniques and also by the rise and rise in virtual SAN-using hyper-converged systems. The concept of Container storage flourished with, for example, NexentaEdge providing storage for stateless Docker containers. Portworx provided persistent storage for containers as did StorageOS and also Hedvig. But, by and large, storage for containers is still an early-stage technology with no clear winners. 3D XPoint had a poor year it has to be said, with continued denials by Intel that it was a variant of phase-change memory (PCM), and a drip feed of performance data that fell a long way short of the grandiose claims a year earlier that it was 1.000 times faster than flash, etc. Intel tried to escape this trap by saying it was talking about raw media speed but, having set the performance, density and endurance bars so high, its original marketing now looks to be hysterical and quite alarmingly inaccurate or imprecise. Whatever the reasons XPoint NVMe drives now don't look so far in front of everything else as to render ReRAM or PCM drives pointless, and XPoint DIMMs, if using DRAM caches like flash DIMMs, won't be that far ahead of flash DIMM performance. We should see actual product this year and will get a better view then. So far, though, XPoint is marketing hype, and Intel and its partner Micron, have to show that their Optane and QuantX products actually merit the hype. Parallel IO was promoted by DataCore and Data Domain. Bridgeworks pushed its TCP/IP networking parallelisation technology with radical transmission time shrinkage when TCP/IP is used for replication with, for example, NetApp SnapMirror. And finally Backup software supplier Veeam had an excellent year with revenues surging ahead. Both Barracuda and Commvault recovered from revenue dips by responding to customers wishes for public cloud-based protection and also for appliances. HPC storage supplier Panasas had a so-so year, with several exec departures early on. Teradata had problems. Tegile chopped a few staff in February, and so too did Atlantis as well as Data Gravity; Paula Long's startup succumbing to financial gravity pressures. Late in the year NetApp laid off several hundred people as part of its efforts to grow again. Veritas also went through a pink slip exercise in December. The on-premises SAN/filer heartland is now in the midst of an all-flash transition for primary data and vendor revenue growth looks to be primarily about taking share from other vendors rather than greenfield site sales. The ways of doing this include better analytics, faster flash and better hybrid (public-private) cloud support. HCIA vendors, secondary storage silo convergers, storage SW-only suppliers, cloud storage gateway file sharers and protectors, and object storage suppliers all see the classic on-premises SAN/filer array as a big, fat, dumb, complex and complacent carcass they can collectively rip to shreds. But there is hope for the SAN and filer suppliers. The key to its survival is dragon-slaying, with the two primary dragons being hyper-converged infrastructure and the public cloud. With product enriched by all-flash and scale-out technology, by NVMe drive and fabric access, by better QoS and analytics, by object storage linking and public cloud back-end access, it can offer a better-than-public cloud storage experience overall and beat HCIA deployments as well. At scale, shared storage is a better bet than hyper-converged storage. As long as the HCIA vendors are trapped by that perception then modern SANs and filers have a chance. But if the HCIA vendors show they can support large scale deployments and the public cloud suppliers continue surging then the on-premises SAN/filer outlook is bleak. See you this time next year to see how things turn out. ®
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/05/the_year_3d_xpoint_came_down_to_earth_from_planet_hype/
Wednesday, January 4, 2017
Top enterprise storage vendors to watch in 2017
The storage world is spinning faster than ever. Fast-paced developments in hyper-convergence, solid-state, software-defined... storage and the cloud are pushing traditional SAN and NAS systems out of the data center, revolutionizing the way we deploy, manage and secure data in the process.
This brings challenges, especially for established vendors (some undergoing corporate changes), and opportunities, particularly for newer players. How these companies live up or down to both in the coming year will tell us a lot about the short- and long-term direction of the storage market.
Here's our rundown of the dozen leading enterprise storage vendors to keep an eye on and what to watch for as 2017 unfolds.
The storage world is spinning faster than ever. Fast-paced developments in hyper-convergence, solid-state, software-defined...
storage and the cloud are pushing traditional SAN and NAS systems out of the data center, revolutionizing the way we deploy, manage and secure data in the process.
This brings challenges, especially for established vendors (some undergoing corporate changes), and opportunities, particularly for newer players. How these companies live up or down to both in the coming year will tell us a lot about the short- and long-term direction of the storage market.
Here's our rundown of the dozen leading enterprise storage vendors to keep an eye on and what to watch for as 2017 unfolds.
Dell EMC
Dell EMC was born Sept. 7, 2016 when Dell's $60 billion-plus acquisition of EMC closed, nearly 11 months after EMC accepted Michael Dell's bid. Executives of the new Dell Technologies -- Dell EMC's parent -- said the time it took waiting to close the biggest IT deal in history gave the newly combined company a head start, which allowed it to hit the ground running. We'll find out in 2017 if that was the case.
As a standalone storage vendor, EMC played in every storage category and provided a target for all other enterprise storage vendors to shoot at. It wasn't unusual for EMC to have multiple products in the same market, often confusing customers, while EMC boasted it is better to have overlap then a gap. Now, Dell EMC has even more products, with Dell's storage, server and networking portfolios joining EMC's legacy platforms. That may leave Dell EMC a bigger player than EMC was alone. But, with the added bulk, can it remain nimble enough to compete?
Dell founder and CEO Michael Dell is betting that bigger is better. The Dell EMC strategy is to become a one-stop shop for customers who want to deal with as few enterprise storage vendors as possible.
At Dell EMC World last October, Dell described his new company as "Nimble and innovative like a startup, but at the scale of a global powerhouse. ... To sum up my expectation for this new company, I'd say we're going to be the trusted provider of essential infrastructure for the next industrial revolution."
At least he didn't promise to make storage great again. He did promise to spend $4.5 billion on research and development while remaining acquisitive despite Dell EMC's already bulging product lineup.
What to watch for: On the storage side, Dell EMC should look more like premerger EMC than premerger Dell; that is, a leader or top contender in every storage category. EMC did a better job than most large storage vendors of spotting the changes in the market the past few years and set a course to transition from large enterprise arrays to flash, hyper-convergence, software-defined and cloud storage. Dell EMC must accelerate that pace to reverse EMC's recent revenue declines, though.
It also bears watching how Dell EMC treats old EMC and Dell partners. Dell EMC has already integrated Dell PowerEdge servers into much of its storage and converged infrastructure. How will that play with old EMC ally Cisco long-term? And how does Dell EMC keep up Dell's old partnerships with Nutanix when it's trying to dislodge Nutanix as the hyper-convergence leader? Also, will Dell try to keep more of VMware's technology to itself than EMC did before the merger?
Nutanix
Like Dell and EMC, Nutanix spent much of 2016 with its corporate status in limbo. After filing for its initial public offering (IPO) in December 2015, the hyper-converged pioneer waited nine months before market conditions allowed it to actually go public late last September.
SearchStorage
Top enterprise storage vendors to watch in 2017
1
by
Dave Raffo
Senior News Director
Check out our comprehensive forecast of what challenges and opportunities the top enterprise storage vendors are expected to face in the coming year.
The storage world is spinning faster than ever. Fast-paced developments in hyper-convergence, solid-state, software-defined...
storage and the cloud are pushing traditional SAN and NAS systems out of the data center, revolutionizing the way we deploy, manage and secure data in the process.
DOWNLOAD THIS FREE GUIDE.
Download "The state of the software-defined storage market"
Storage magazine's March issue looks at the software-defined storage market, what you need to know about cloud archive and how NAS storage systems fared in our Quality Awards.
Corporate E-mail Address:
Download Now
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.
Safe Harbor
This brings challenges, especially for established vendors (some undergoing corporate changes), and opportunities, particularly for newer players. How these companies live up or down to both in the coming year will tell us a lot about the short- and long-term direction of the storage market.
Here's our rundown of the dozen leading enterprise storage vendors to keep an eye on and what to watch for as 2017 unfolds.
Dell EMC
Dell EMC was born Sept. 7, 2016 when Dell's $60 billion-plus acquisition of EMC closed, nearly 11 months after EMC accepted Michael Dell's bid. Executives of the new Dell Technologies -- Dell EMC's parent -- said the time it took waiting to close the biggest IT deal in history gave the newly combined company a head start, which allowed it to hit the ground running. We'll find out in 2017 if that was the case.
As a standalone storage vendor, EMC played in every storage category and provided a target for all other enterprise storage vendors to shoot at. It wasn't unusual for EMC to have multiple products in the same market, often confusing customers, while EMC boasted it is better to have overlap then a gap. Now, Dell EMC has even more products, with Dell's storage, server and networking portfolios joining EMC's legacy platforms. That may leave Dell EMC a bigger player than EMC was alone. But, with the added bulk, can it remain nimble enough to compete?
Dell founder and CEO Michael Dell is betting that bigger is better. The Dell EMC strategy is to become a one-stop shop for customers who want to deal with as few enterprise storage vendors as possible.
At Dell EMC World last October, Dell described his new company as "Nimble and innovative like a startup, but at the scale of a global powerhouse. ... To sum up my expectation for this new company, I'd say we're going to be the trusted provider of essential infrastructure for the next industrial revolution."
At least he didn't promise to make storage great again. He did promise to spend $4.5 billion on research and development while remaining acquisitive despite Dell EMC's already bulging product lineup.
What to watch for: On the storage side, Dell EMC should look more like premerger EMC than premerger Dell; that is, a leader or top contender in every storage category. EMC did a better job than most large storage vendors of spotting the changes in the market the past few years and set a course to transition from large enterprise arrays to flash, hyper-convergence, software-defined and cloud storage. Dell EMC must accelerate that pace to reverse EMC's recent revenue declines, though.
It also bears watching how Dell EMC treats old EMC and Dell partners. Dell EMC has already integrated Dell PowerEdge servers into much of its storage and converged infrastructure. How will that play with old EMC ally Cisco long-term? And how does Dell EMC keep up Dell's old partnerships with Nutanix when it's trying to dislodge Nutanix as the hyper-convergence leader? Also, will Dell try to keep more of VMware's technology to itself than EMC did before the merger?
Nutanix
Like Dell and EMC, Nutanix spent much of 2016 with its corporate status in limbo. After filing for its initial public offering (IPO) in December 2015, the hyper-converged pioneer waited nine months before market conditions allowed it to actually go public late last September.
PRO+
Content
E-Zine
The state of the software-defined storage market
E-Zine
Twelve data storage industry startups to watch in 2016
Nutanix didn't sit idle during those months, however. It continued to build out its software stack and laid out plans to take on Amazon Web Services in the cloud and VMware in virtualization. Those plans make it clear Nutanix isn't afraid of picking fights with big dogs. It also fired a shot at Cisco by going past the networking and server giant to strike a deal with VARs to sell Nutanix software on Cisco servers.
Entering 2017, Nutanix's dominance in hyper-convergence is far from assured. Part of Dell EMC has drawn a bullseye over Nutanix's spot as the hyper-converged infrastructure (HCI) market leader, even as another part of Dell EMC resells Nutanix software. VMware, yet another segment of Dell Technologies, now has more users of its vSAN HCI software than Nutanix, and VMware makes vSAN available to large hardware vendors. Server vendors Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Lenovo are also stepping up in hyper-convergence, although Lenovo partners and competes with Nutanix as well. Then there are smaller HCI players such as Pivot3, Scale Computing and SimpliVity trying to cash in on the market Nutanix created, at Nutanix's expense.
Nutanix claims its technology has gone beyond the original concept of hyper-convergence and wants to relabel itself an enterprise private cloud platform vendor, with the stated goal of providing simplicity across all data center infrastructure. The Nutanix software stack now includes a hypervisor and network management, but moving beyond its HCI roots brings challenges along with opportunities. If successful, it could be the next big IT company. There is a chance Nutanix won't be able to keep up with the pace it has set for itself, though.
What to watch for: the bottom line. Now that it is a public company, Nutanix's finances are an open book. Nutanix has never made money in a quarter. Its pre-IPO accumulated losses hit $442 million, including $168.5 million in the four most recent quarters. Can it continue to spend enough on marketing and research to hold off Dell EMC while simultaneously cutting losses? Recent IPOs haven't worked out well for enterprise storage vendors. Fusion-io, Nimble Storage and Violin Memory all hit choppy waters in the public market. Like Pure Storage, Nutanix strives to buck that trend.
Pure Storage
Like Nutanix in hyper-convergence, Pure Storage is the dominant player among the plethora of all-flash array startups who appeared from around 2007 to 2012. It built a flash array with storage features that enterprises want rather than concentrating only on performance. So while almost all of the other early flash startups were either acquired or went out of business, Pure Storage became a public company and solidified a spot among the market leaders in the rapidly growing all-flash market.
Getting that spot was difficult, and staying there will be just as hard. The larger storage array vendors are often quick to cut prices to compete with Pure Storage's FlashArray. Most flash vendors have also followed Pure's lead with extended guarantees and free controller upgrades. And while Pure Storage executives declare that legacy enterprise storage vendors will never catch up to Pure Storage's flash design, the likes of Dell EMC, NetApp and IBM now have platforms designed from the ground up for flash.
Pure Storage has identified nonvolatile memory express, or NVMe, as an important flash battlefield for 2017 and beyond, and will begin to implement it aggressively in arrays in this year. The company is also expanding its product lineup with FlashBlade, a scale-out system for unstructured data.
What to watch for: Pure Storage CEO Scott Dietzen has pledged to become cash-flow positive by the end of 2017. Like Nutanix, Pure Storage walks a tightrope of continuing to spend on product development and marketing while improving its bottom line. FlashBlade makes Pure Storage more than a one-trick pony, but it faces competition from Dell EMC's new all-flash Isilon scale-out NAS array.
Veritas
Freed from Symantec for more than a year now, Veritas is trying to convince the world it is more than a backup vendor. NetBackup remains its flagship product, but Veritas is trying to build that -- along with products in the areas of archiving, distributed file system, file classification, software-defined storage, copy data management and unstructured data visibility -- into a comprehensive storage management platform. At the same time, it's attempting to tie all that into the cloud.
Veritas' challenge here is combining all of those products -- many acquired rather than developed internally -- into a cohesive platform. Smaller competitors maintain a leg up in some areas. Commvault has already built its data protection pieces into a platform that embraces the cloud, for instance. Veeam Software is expanding its data protection assets faster than Veritas. And Actifio, Catalogic and others already have the copy data management Veritas is striving for with its Velocity beta appliance. In 2017, customers will look for strong signs from Veritas that it's committed to putting its pieces together and knows how to do it.
What to watch for: How long will it take for Veritas to bring its vision to reality? Some of the key pieces are still in the trial stage. That includes Information Map, which taps into metadata in the NetBackup catalog to help users better understand their data and what to do with it. Full availability of Information Map can bring Veritas a big step closer to fulfilling its mission. Veritas also needs to fully integrate Velocity with NetBackup and broaden its public cloud support.
Broadcom
This company will likely determine the future of Fibre Channel (FC) networking. Broadcom's pending $5.9 billion acquisition of Brocade will make it the FC switching leader and the only vendor to sell FC switches and Host Bus Adapters (HBAs). The vendor's journey into storage began when chipmaker Avago acquired LSI for $6.6 billion in 2013. Avago added HBA vendor Emulex for $606 million in 2015 and then acquired Broadcom for $37 billion. After the Broadcom deal, Avago rebranded itself by adopting the better-known Broadcom name.
Broadcom's Brocade acquisition comes at a crucial time for FC SANs, as 2017 is a transition period from 16 Gbps to 32 Gbps FC. The Brocade deal is expected to close around mid-2017, and any distraction could hinder how fast the industry moves to 32-Gig FC. Or it could open the door for Brocade's only FC switch rival, Cisco, to steal market share.
What to watch for: With FC moving to 32 Gbps, Broadcom needs a smooth transition with the Brocade acquisition. Brocade is a loud voice for FC, particularly with its bandwidth upgrades and move to Gen 6 (32-gig). With so many other technologies under its umbrella, will Broadcom be as strong of an FC advocate?
The storage world is spinning faster than ever. Fast-paced developments in hyper-convergence, solid-state, software-defined...
storage and the cloud are pushing traditional SAN and NAS systems out of the data center, revolutionizing the way we deploy, manage and secure data in the process.
DOWNLOAD THIS FREE GUIDE.
Download "The state of the software-defined storage market"
Storage magazine's March issue looks at the software-defined storage market, what you need to know about cloud archive and how NAS storage systems fared in our Quality Awards.
Corporate E-mail Address:
Download Now
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.
Safe Harbor
This brings challenges, especially for established vendors (some undergoing corporate changes), and opportunities, particularly for newer players. How these companies live up or down to both in the coming year will tell us a lot about the short- and long-term direction of the storage market.
Here's our rundown of the dozen leading enterprise storage vendors to keep an eye on and what to watch for as 2017 unfolds.
Dell EMC
Dell EMC was born Sept. 7, 2016 when Dell's $60 billion-plus acquisition of EMC closed, nearly 11 months after EMC accepted Michael Dell's bid. Executives of the new Dell Technologies -- Dell EMC's parent -- said the time it took waiting to close the biggest IT deal in history gave the newly combined company a head start, which allowed it to hit the ground running. We'll find out in 2017 if that was the case.
As a standalone storage vendor, EMC played in every storage category and provided a target for all other enterprise storage vendors to shoot at. It wasn't unusual for EMC to have multiple products in the same market, often confusing customers, while EMC boasted it is better to have overlap then a gap. Now, Dell EMC has even more products, with Dell's storage, server and networking portfolios joining EMC's legacy platforms. That may leave Dell EMC a bigger player than EMC was alone. But, with the added bulk, can it remain nimble enough to compete?
Dell founder and CEO Michael Dell is betting that bigger is better. The Dell EMC strategy is to become a one-stop shop for customers who want to deal with as few enterprise storage vendors as possible.
At Dell EMC World last October, Dell described his new company as "Nimble and innovative like a startup, but at the scale of a global powerhouse. ... To sum up my expectation for this new company, I'd say we're going to be the trusted provider of essential infrastructure for the next industrial revolution."
At least he didn't promise to make storage great again. He did promise to spend $4.5 billion on research and development while remaining acquisitive despite Dell EMC's already bulging product lineup.
What to watch for: On the storage side, Dell EMC should look more like premerger EMC than premerger Dell; that is, a leader or top contender in every storage category. EMC did a better job than most large storage vendors of spotting the changes in the market the past few years and set a course to transition from large enterprise arrays to flash, hyper-convergence, software-defined and cloud storage. Dell EMC must accelerate that pace to reverse EMC's recent revenue declines, though.
It also bears watching how Dell EMC treats old EMC and Dell partners. Dell EMC has already integrated Dell PowerEdge servers into much of its storage and converged infrastructure. How will that play with old EMC ally Cisco long-term? And how does Dell EMC keep up Dell's old partnerships with Nutanix when it's trying to dislodge Nutanix as the hyper-convergence leader? Also, will Dell try to keep more of VMware's technology to itself than EMC did before the merger?
Nutanix
Like Dell and EMC, Nutanix spent much of 2016 with its corporate status in limbo. After filing for its initial public offering (IPO) in December 2015, the hyper-converged pioneer waited nine months before market conditions allowed it to actually go public late last September.
PRO+
Content
E-Zine
The state of the software-defined storage market
E-Zine
Twelve data storage industry startups to watch in 2016
Nutanix didn't sit idle during those months, however. It continued to build out its software stack and laid out plans to take on Amazon Web Services in the cloud and VMware in virtualization. Those plans make it clear Nutanix isn't afraid of picking fights with big dogs. It also fired a shot at Cisco by going past the networking and server giant to strike a deal with VARs to sell Nutanix software on Cisco servers.
Entering 2017, Nutanix's dominance in hyper-convergence is far from assured. Part of Dell EMC has drawn a bullseye over Nutanix's spot as the hyper-converged infrastructure (HCI) market leader, even as another part of Dell EMC resells Nutanix software. VMware, yet another segment of Dell Technologies, now has more users of its vSAN HCI software than Nutanix, and VMware makes vSAN available to large hardware vendors. Server vendors Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Lenovo are also stepping up in hyper-convergence, although Lenovo partners and competes with Nutanix as well. Then there are smaller HCI players such as Pivot3, Scale Computing and SimpliVity trying to cash in on the market Nutanix created, at Nutanix's expense.
Nutanix claims its technology has gone beyond the original concept of hyper-convergence and wants to relabel itself an enterprise private cloud platform vendor, with the stated goal of providing simplicity across all data center infrastructure. The Nutanix software stack now includes a hypervisor and network management, but moving beyond its HCI roots brings challenges along with opportunities. If successful, it could be the next big IT company. There is a chance Nutanix won't be able to keep up with the pace it has set for itself, though.
What to watch for: the bottom line. Now that it is a public company, Nutanix's finances are an open book. Nutanix has never made money in a quarter. Its pre-IPO accumulated losses hit $442 million, including $168.5 million in the four most recent quarters. Can it continue to spend enough on marketing and research to hold off Dell EMC while simultaneously cutting losses? Recent IPOs haven't worked out well for enterprise storage vendors. Fusion-io, Nimble Storage and Violin Memory all hit choppy waters in the public market. Like Pure Storage, Nutanix strives to buck that trend.
Pure Storage
Like Nutanix in hyper-convergence, Pure Storage is the dominant player among the plethora of all-flash array startups who appeared from around 2007 to 2012. It built a flash array with storage features that enterprises want rather than concentrating only on performance. So while almost all of the other early flash startups were either acquired or went out of business, Pure Storage became a public company and solidified a spot among the market leaders in the rapidly growing all-flash market.
Getting that spot was difficult, and staying there will be just as hard. The larger storage array vendors are often quick to cut prices to compete with Pure Storage's FlashArray. Most flash vendors have also followed Pure's lead with extended guarantees and free controller upgrades. And while Pure Storage executives declare that legacy enterprise storage vendors will never catch up to Pure Storage's flash design, the likes of Dell EMC, NetApp and IBM now have platforms designed from the ground up for flash.
Pure Storage has identified nonvolatile memory express, or NVMe, as an important flash battlefield for 2017 and beyond, and will begin to implement it aggressively in arrays in this year. The company is also expanding its product lineup with FlashBlade, a scale-out system for unstructured data.
What to watch for: Pure Storage CEO Scott Dietzen has pledged to become cash-flow positive by the end of 2017. Like Nutanix, Pure Storage walks a tightrope of continuing to spend on product development and marketing while improving its bottom line. FlashBlade makes Pure Storage more than a one-trick pony, but it faces competition from Dell EMC's new all-flash Isilon scale-out NAS array.
Veritas
Freed from Symantec for more than a year now, Veritas is trying to convince the world it is more than a backup vendor. NetBackup remains its flagship product, but Veritas is trying to build that -- along with products in the areas of archiving, distributed file system, file classification, software-defined storage, copy data management and unstructured data visibility -- into a comprehensive storage management platform. At the same time, it's attempting to tie all that into the cloud.
Veritas' challenge here is combining all of those products -- many acquired rather than developed internally -- into a cohesive platform. Smaller competitors maintain a leg up in some areas. Commvault has already built its data protection pieces into a platform that embraces the cloud, for instance. Veeam Software is expanding its data protection assets faster than Veritas. And Actifio, Catalogic and others already have the copy data management Veritas is striving for with its Velocity beta appliance. In 2017, customers will look for strong signs from Veritas that it's committed to putting its pieces together and knows how to do it.
What to watch for: How long will it take for Veritas to bring its vision to reality? Some of the key pieces are still in the trial stage. That includes Information Map, which taps into metadata in the NetBackup catalog to help users better understand their data and what to do with it. Full availability of Information Map can bring Veritas a big step closer to fulfilling its mission. Veritas also needs to fully integrate Velocity with NetBackup and broaden its public cloud support.
Broadcom
This company will likely determine the future of Fibre Channel (FC) networking. Broadcom's pending $5.9 billion acquisition of Brocade will make it the FC switching leader and the only vendor to sell FC switches and Host Bus Adapters (HBAs). The vendor's journey into storage began when chipmaker Avago acquired LSI for $6.6 billion in 2013. Avago added HBA vendor Emulex for $606 million in 2015 and then acquired Broadcom for $37 billion. After the Broadcom deal, Avago rebranded itself by adopting the better-known Broadcom name.
Broadcom's Brocade acquisition comes at a crucial time for FC SANs, as 2017 is a transition period from 16 Gbps to 32 Gbps FC. The Brocade deal is expected to close around mid-2017, and any distraction could hinder how fast the industry moves to 32-Gig FC. Or it could open the door for Brocade's only FC switch rival, Cisco, to steal market share.
What to watch for: With FC moving to 32 Gbps, Broadcom needs a smooth transition with the Brocade acquisition. Brocade is a loud voice for FC, particularly with its bandwidth upgrades and move to Gen 6 (32-gig). With so many other technologies under its umbrella, will Broadcom be as strong of an FC advocate?
Enterprise storage vendors on the hot seat
Enterprise storage vendors rarely vanish into thin air. Even vendors who struggle mightily are more likely to get acquired for their technology than disappear. But, as 2017 gets underway, three vendors are in grave danger of having to shut their doors.
Violin Memory and FalconStor have already put themselves on the sales block, but they found no takers. Now Violin is in bankruptcy, hoping for a last-ditch fire sale of its assets.
Imation restructured around its Nexsan storage portfolio after selling off most of its other assets. In December, it also spun out Nexsan to private investors, although it will still own a 50% stake. All three claim to have winning products now, but the math is against them.
Violin helped invent the all-flash market. Early success transformed it into a public company in 2013, but sales have slowed to a trickle. While all-flash sales are booming industrywide, Violin managed less than $28.2 million in revenue for the first half of 2016 (the most recent figures available). When it filed for bankruptcy in December 2016, Violin had $3.62 million in cash and forecasted that to drop to around $1.6 million by Jan. 20, 2017. Violin lost more than $20 million in each of the first two quarters of 2016 after dropping $99 million the previous year.
Violin launched new arrays in September 2016 -- the Flash Storage Platform (FSP) 7650 and 7450 -- in a last-ditch stab at survival. "We still have many challenges to return to growth and complete our turnaround," Violin CEO Kevin DeNuccio said in a September earnings conference call.
FalconStor pins its hopes on its FreeStor data management software. It claimed more than 300 FreeStor customers in less than two years, but continues to lose millions of dollars every quarter. FalconStor lost $9.4 million over the first nine months of 2016, leaving it with $6.1 million in cash. Like Violin, it needs to find more customers in a hurry.
"We realize that we need to continue to win new customers, convert existing customers and develop new routes to market like service providers," FalconStor CEO Gary Quinn said during an earnings call in November. "We are on the right path, although sometimes it may not seem like it. We are moving ahead."
Imation was a multibillion dollar technology company 10 years ago. Now, it's down to Nexsan storage, which pulled in only $32.8 million in revenue for the first nine months of 2016 before the spinout. Imation lost $103.8 million during that period and had $50 million left. Imation's cash balance totaled $49.6 million before dumping Nexsan. Nexsan launched a new Unity multiprotocol storage array in 2016, but it's unlikely that a single platform can lift it out of its sales funk.
Western Digital
Like Broadcom, Western Digital (WD) has spent the past few years acquiring pieces of the storage puzzle -- most notably, HDD rival HGST and flash giant SanDisk. Now, it has to try to put those pieces together in a cohesive manner.
The absorption of HGST makes WD, along with Seagate, one of the two main HDD vendors. WD also has SanDisk's flash array and NAND product lines, including the InfiniFlash all-flash array that IBM and others sell through OEM deals. All total, WD is expected to hit revenue of around $17 billion in 2017. Its product lines also include Helium-filled HDDs -- currently hitting 10 TB -- and Active Archive object storage.
What to watch for: Much of Western Digital's products are under the hood, sold through OEM deals and rebranded. That gives it far less visibility than many smaller enterprise storage vendors. But it can become better known through IntelliFlash all-flash arrays and Active Archive object storage as those technologies experience rapid growth.
Seagate
Where does an HDD titan fit in an increasingly flash world? Seagate has been much slower to gravitate to SSDs than its rival Western Digital. Yet it is getting plenty more life out of its capacity HDDs, which have actually become more popular even as SSDs take over performance tiers in storage arrays.
Seagate isn't flash-free. It has flash products acquired from LSI and ships SSDs in storage systems from its Dot Hill and Xyratex acquisitions. Seagate also previewed a 60 TB SSD last August that it expects to ship in 2017. But with a 3.5-inch form factor, that whopper is more suited to bulk storage than performance.
Seagate's flash product lineup is skimpy compared to WD's. People throughout the industry keep waiting for Seagate to show it's as serious about SSDs as it is about HDDs.
What to watch for: Seagate will have to jump into solid state with both feet eventually, probably through an acquisition (maybe it will buy its NAND partner Micron). It's hard to imagine the vendor will go through all of 2017 without making a move.
NetApp
When Dell revealed plans to buy EMC in late 2015, storage insiders guessed that NetApp would also get gobbled up. It hasn't happened. NetApp is now the largest standalone storage vendor, but faces the same harsh reality as EMC before the Dell deal. That is, storage revenue is barely growing and NetApp's has been shrinking.
NetApp has made progress with helping customers upgrade to its Clustered Data ONTAP operating system, but that is still a disruptive upgrade.
It also finally became a serious all-flash array vendor with its All Flash FAS in 2016, and it is pushing hard to help customers move to the cloud. NetApp is still missing hyper-convergence and a software-defined storage platform that takes advantage of hardware outside of its own, though.
NetApp disclosed a 6% layoff of its workforce in November, indicating the vendor is hardly in growth mode.
What to watch for: If there is a large IT vendor looking to buy a storage company, NetApp will merit strong consideration. If not, NetApp has to find a way to stay relevant with its legacy technology. And a year after buying SolidFire, it needs to show progress in sales of the all-flash platform aimed at DevOps and cloud providers.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
A year after Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) spun out of the Hewlett-Packard breakup, its storage portfolio hasn't changed much. HPE 3PAR StoreServ remains a success story, but there is little else to talk about. While 3PAR sales have helped HPE gain market share, the vendor still lacks a dedicated all-flash platform (there is a 3PAR all-flash version), its own object storage and a strong hyper-converged product.
As a server and storage vendor, HPE will need to become a strong player in hyper-convergence. The vendor has already taken several cracks at it without making much impact. With VMware now the property of rival Dell Technologies, HPE may become less reliant on VMware's vSAN hyper-converged software.
What to watch for: With its post-split transition behind it, look for HPE to pursue acquisitions in 2017. The shopping list should include hyper-convergence, all-flash arrays and perhaps object storage.
Hitachi Data Systems
Like other members of the storage "old guard," Hitachi Data Systems (HDS) must transform its technologies to fit the modern data center. So HDS is modifying its storage products, getting flash into its flagship Virtual Storage Platform (VSP) arrays while pumping out hyper-converged products in its Unified Compute Platform (UCP) and beefing up its Hitachi Content Platform object storage for the cloud. But the most important shift in HDS is its role in the Hitachi parent company's move to become a player in the internet of things (IoT) through its Lumada reference platform. Lumada uses big data analytics technology HDS acquired from Pentaho in 2015. Its strategy is to embed IoT technology across all products. A sound strategy, but can such an engineering-oriented company pivot fast enough to keep up with such a rapidly changing IT world?
What to watch for: How fast will Hitachi expand its Lumada/Pentaho technology across its products? And how big of a role will HDS play in the Hitachi Insight Group that oversees IoT technologies?
IBM
IBM sums up its storage array strategy in three words: flash, flash, flash. The vendor has aggressively turned its array platforms to all-flash, but that's table stakes these days. If IBM is to reverse its long-running storage sales declines, it must bulk up its Spectrum software and Cleversafe-built cloud storage products and services, too. A hyper-converged platform wouldn't hurt, either.
Watch to watch for: After 20 straight quarters of year-over-year declines in storage hardware revenue, when will IBM's storage business hit bottom and start to rebound? IBM's new storage general manager Ed Walsh has a strong record turning around startups, but can he wake a sleeping giant?
Lenovo
Lenovo, which bought IBM's System x86 server business in 2014, is pushing to become a player in server-based storage. It has put together a roster of software-defined and hyper-converged software partners, including Cloudian, Nexenta Systems, Nutanix, Pivot3, SimpliVity and StorMagic. Lenovo also sells IBM Storwize arrays under the Lenovo brand through an OEM deal and has a converged infrastructure program with Nimble Storage. You can expect more partnerships in 2017.
http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/feature/Top-enterprise-storage-vendors-to-watch-in-2017
Thursday, December 15, 2016
Violin Memory Files For Chapter 11
#ViolinMemory has had a rough go of it recently but it appears as if they are nearing the end of their rope. Violin was a pioneer of early #allflash arrays, which are becoming more and more common in data center, along with all-flash data centers. However, the company was been plagued with issues for some time now and earlier this morning they announced they would be pursuing Chapter 11 operational and financial reorganization. Chapter 11 doesn’t always mean the end of a company; in this case, however, it looks as though Violin Memory is finished.
http://www.storagereview.com/violin_memory_files_for_chapter_11
Tuesday, September 20, 2016
EMC: King of storage needs to shore up defences
IDC’s latest storage tracker says the enterprise storage market was flat in the 12 months since 2015’s second quarter, but #HPE now ties with #EMC for first place, with #IBM and #NetApp in equal fourth place after Dell. EMC (18.1 per cent) lost -5.5 per cent points of revenue share in the year, HPE (17.6 per cent) gained 8.8 per cent, Dell (11.5 per cent) a relative monster increase of 13.8 per cent, IBM (6.8 per cent) lost -15.6 per cent (recently-appointed storage boss Ed Walsh has a mountain to climb) with NetApp (6.7 per cent) losing -3.2 per cent. The market amounted to $8.83 BN, with ‘Others’ taking 30.3 per cent of that and ODM direct 9 per cent. Now that EMC is part of #DellTechnologies the combo will dominate the enterprise storage market, having a 29.6 per cent share. Looking at external storage alone, IDC’s number-crunchers say EMC led the $5.67bn market with a 28.2 per cent share, down 5.5 per cent as above. HPE and NetApp tried for second place with 10.6 and 10.5 per cent shares respectively. IBM had 9.5 per cent in fourth place and Hitachi and Dell tied for fifth place with 7.4 and 7 per cent shares. HPE’s external storage revenues rose 0.8 per cent on the year while Hitachi’s rose 14.7 per cent and Dell’a 5.8 per cent. NetApp and IBM lost 3.32 and 14.7 per cent respectively. IDC notes that the total All Flash Array (AFA) market generated almost $1.1 billion in revenue during the quarter, up 94.5 per cent year over year, but didn’t release supplier numbers to the great unwashed public. An EMC insider tells us EMC gained 9.1 percentage points. Netapp lost 6.8, HPE gained 1.5 and Pure Storage garnered a single percentage point. Stifel MD Aaron Rakers notes from IDC’s tracker that “All-Flash revenue now accounts for 19 per cent of total storage revenue, up from 15 per cent and 10 per cent in the prior and year-ago quarters, respectively,” and “hybrid storage revenue of $2.3 billion declined 5.1 per cent y/y, marking the 5th consecutive quarter of y/y decline.” Rakers tabulated supplier numbers which make for some interesting reading:/p> EMC (XtremIO and VMAX/VNX) - 36 per cent share - up 204 per cent y/y NetApp (EF540/550 and AF FAS) - 16.1 per cent - up 362 per cent y/y Pure Storage - 13.4 per cent up 204.6 per cent y/y HP (3PAR 7450) - 12.5 per cent - up 208 per cent y/y IBM (FlashSystem) - 11 per -cent - up 143 per cent y/y Violin Memory - 1.1 per cent - up 58 per cent y/y Others - 9.8 per cent - up 121 per cent y/y Of the standalone flash array startups, only Pure Storage and Violin rate individual mentions. ®
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/09/19/weakness_appears_in_emcs_storage_dominance/
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
Violin, still pushing flash speeds, looks to the cloud
Thursday, September 1, 2016
Enterprise SSD Vendors: 8 Leaders
Enterprise SSD vendors now enjoy a thriving market. But it wasn’t always so. Like any new technology, it took the solid state drive (SSD) a little longer to find enterprise acceptance than it did to find consumer acceptance. And just as well. While consumers were paying $1,000 for a 60GB SSD, the enterprise sat back and waited. Enterprise storage is highly sensitive to data loss issues. This isn't about losing pictures of your vacation, this is about the data that runs a business. So IT managers wanted to wait until things like measureable mean time before failure (MTBF) and write durability started to emerge. “Enterprise” SATA SSDs are difficult to define, notes Jim Handy, principal analyst for Objective Research, who follows the SSD market. So difficult, in fact, that serious players shun the term "Enterprise" and use other words like "Data Center." Consumer/enterprise vendors like #Intel, #Samsung, and #Micron all do very well in this market, as does #WesternDigital through its #SanDisk subsidiary. #EMC #Violin #Pure #Diablo #Oracle #IBM
"The key to success here is reliability, and Western Digital and Intel are both very highly trusted by system administrators, whereas most other companies are less well known," said Handy. As durability and wear level increased along with capacity and speed, the enterprise began to slowly embrace the SSD as the logical replacement for the 15,000 RPM drives used in data centers for "hot storage," data that was accessed frequently. While very fast, 15k RPM drives also had high failure rates and low capacity, usually 73GB or 144GB, a pittance. SSDs now live in the enterprise as a cache for fast and regular data access, usually between hard disk storage and memory. At first, SSDs were the bailiwick of newer companies, but the old storage guard has gotten into the market through both its own products and strategic acquisitions. There are a lot of vendors to choose from, and we've chosen eight to keep an eye on. Enterprise SSD Vendors 1) Intel The company known for its CPUs started out as a DRAM maker, after all, so it’s a logical full circle for Intel to get into SSDs. Point of fact, it's actually one of the best makers out there. Intel knows chips. It knows how to design them and it knows how to manufacture them, and that's 99% of the battle. In the case of Intel SSDs, though, the manufacturing is done by Micron, but it and Intel have a deep partnership that undoubtedly includes help in manufacturing. Intel's real contribution is the Non-Volatile Memory Exchange, a host controller for PCI Express-based SSDs. The primary interface for SSDs is SATA, but that bus has just 6Gbits/sec. transfer rates. PCIe 3.0, the latest version of the spec, allows for 1GB/sec per lane, and PCIe SSDs are usually 16 lanes. In addition to speed, NVMe introduced a controller designed for SSD. The majority of SSD controllers in the early days were modified or adapted hard disk controllers, which didn't take into account how differently an SSD reads and writes data. NVMe was built for flash memory. As a result, many SSD makers offer NVMe-based PCIe SSDs. 2) Western Digital The biggest hard drive maker also made the smartest acquisitions. It purchased HGST from Hitachi (which in turn bought the hard drive business from IBM years earlier) and it purchased SanDisk. WD is a clear leader in the SAS market through their HGST acquisition. They were early to market with a quality SAS SSD by partnering with Intel and that gave them a lead. SAS, though, is a niche of the overall SSD market. SATA, despite being slower and maxed out, is still dominant. SAS does have one thing going for it: it is tuned for a 70/30 ratio of reads to writes, and the emphasis is on reads. Enterprise apps look for high endurance write levels. In the last two years, people have noticed high read loads rather than high write loads, said Handy. Data center SSDs, with low writes per day, don’t need write endurance as much as previously thought. 3) IBM/Texas Memory Systems TMS was the originator of SSD storage systems, coming out with its first drive back in 1978, before it was known as an SSD. It introduced its first full line of SSDs called RamSan in 2000. TMS offers SSD, DRAM caching and PCIe flash storage. TMS is a very high-end company and charges top dollar. Its Opera line of drives was tuned specifically to accelerate Oracle databases. And one-third of its business is government. TMS has a lot of with very high-level clearances to hand hold the secret government customers. It was acquired by IBM in 2012, which continues to sell it as a high-end storage and cache product. 4) EMC A company built on storage, EMC has no less than five flash storage systems. * DSSD * XtremIO * All-flash VMAX * All-flash Unity * All-flash VNX2 And after the company's purchase by Dell clears, there will also be the all-flash Dell SC line. XtremIO was purchased in 2012. XtremIO is a high availability unit with high speed reads and writes across "bricks" of eight for maximum throughput. EMC promises on deduplication, data protection and the fastest throughput available. EMC has been aggressive in bundling XtremIO with their normal storage systems. Customers who ask for regular systems are often offered XtremIO for a bargain basement price, said handy. 5) Pure Storage Pure Storage started up in 2009 as enterprise storage products company built around flash memory. The company's flagship product, called FlashArray is designed to accelerate applications that require very high rates of random IOPS like server virtualization, database systems, and cloud computing. It uses both InfiniBand and Fibre Channel for connections. Pure Storage uses multi-level cell flash memory, which has higher capacity for the same price than single-level cell memory. Using data compression and data deduplication, the firm markets the FlashArray to compete with traditional disk arrays. The company claims FlashArray requires about 20% of the power and space required for traditional disk-based arrays. 6) Oracle All of the high end systems vendors are knee deep in SSD, but Oracle really jumped in with both feet, and early. As early as 2009, Oracle was advocating using SSD to run its database. The 2010 purchase of Sun Microsystems only furthered that effort, as Sun was an early supporter of enterprise SSD as a cache between apps and traditional hard drive storage. Oracle has built on Sun's efforts and now uses massive amounts of flash storage for caching purposes. Its Exadata servers pack multiple 3.2TB flash PCI Express drives, for example. Oracle also offers a separate SAN block storage system called Pillar, which offers application-aware unified SAN and NAS functionality, and also supports NAS, Fibre Channel, and iSCSI modules. Because of this, it combines flash with traditional disks, which consolidates all storage requirements onto a single system. 7) Diablo Technologies Since 2010, Diablo has been working on an SSD technology called Memory Channel Storage, which puts flash memory onto DRAM sticks and goes into the DRAM slot, rather than SATA or PCIe. This gives NAND flash direct access to the CPU, and vice versa, since the DRAM slots connect directly to the CPU. This requires changes to the BIOS to see the memory, so not every server can utilize it. Most recently, Diablo introduced a 128GB DDR4 memory DIMM. 8) Violin Memory Violin Memory specializes in rackmount flash memory arrays that offer performance and low spike or spike-free latency for business-critical applications and virtualized environments. Its arrays are specifically designed for extreme sustained performance and can scale to tens of terabytes of capacity, millions of IOPs per second, and gigabytes per second of bandwidth at low latency. Violin was a pioneer in big controller SSD architecture, so background tasks don't interrupt data flow. It uses an FPGA design, which is reprogrammable and updatable, and Violin also makes its own boards, again designed for high-performance and high-throughput. It makes its own flash arrays, called VIMMs or Violin Intelligent Memory Modules.
http://mobile.infostor.com/disk-arrays/enterprise-ssd-vendors-8-leaders.html